Comparative Efficacy of Continuous Ceftazidime Infusion vs. Intermittent Bolus against In Vitro Ceftazidime-Susceptible and -Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm.

Background: As the anti-biofilm pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of antibiotics are not well-defined, we have evaluated the PK/PD indices for different regimens of ceftazidime (CAZ; with/without colistin) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm. Methods: We have used the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Biofilm Reactor with two susceptible (PAO1 and HUB-PAS) and one resistant (HUB-XDR) strains of P. aeruginosa. The regimens were CAZ monotherapies (mimicking a human dose of 2 g/8 h, CAZ-IB; 6 g/daily as continuous infusion at 50 mg/L, CAZ-CI50; and 9 g/daily at 70 mg/L, CAZ-CI70) and CAZ-colistin combinations. Efficacy was correlated with the CAZ PK/PD parameters. Results: CAZ-CI70 was the most effective monotherapy against CAZ-susceptible strains (Δlog CFU/mL 54-0 h = -4.15 ± 0.59 and -3.05 ± 0.5 for HUB-PAS and PAO1, respectively; p ≤ 0.007 vs. other monotherapies), and adding colistin improved the efficacy over CAZ monotherapy. CAZ monotherapies were ineffective against the HUB-XDR strain, and CAZ-CI50 plus colistin achieved higher efficacy than CAZ-IB with colistin. The PK/PD index that correlated best with anti-biofilm efficacy was fAUC0-24h/MIC (r2 = 0.78). Conclusions: CAZ exhibited dose-dependent anti-biofilm killing against P. aeruginosa, which was better explained by the fAUC0-24h/MIC index. CAZ-CI provided benefits compared to CAZ-IB, particularly when using higher doses and together with colistin. CAZ monotherapies were ineffective against the CAZ-resistant strain, independently of the optimized strategy and only CAZ-CI plus colistin appeared useful for clinical practice.

Comparative Efficacy of Conservative Surgery vs Minor Amputation for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical intervention for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Conservative surgery-amputation-free resection of infected bone and soft tissues-is gaining traction as an alternative to minor amputation. Our primary objective was to explore the comparative effectiveness of conservative surgery and minor amputations in clinical failure risk 1 year after index intervention. We also aimed to explore microbiological recurrence at 1 year, and revision surgery risk over a 10-year study period. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center chart review of DFO patients undergoing either conservative surgery or minor amputation. We used multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates to explore the effect of surgical intervention on clinical failure (recurrent diabetic foot infection at surgical site within 1 year after index operation), microbiological recurrence at 1 year, and revision surgery risk over a 10-year follow-up period. RESULTS: 651 patients were included (conservative surgery, n = 121; minor amputation, n = 530). Clinical failure occurred in 34 (28%) patients in the conservative surgery group, and in 111 (21%) of the minor amputation group at 1 year (P = .09). After controlling for potential confounders, we found no association between conservative surgery and clinical failure at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.1). We found no between-group differences in microbiological recurrence at 1 year (conservative surgery: 8 [6.6%]; minor amputation: 33 [6.2%]; P = .25; adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5-2.6). Over the 10-year period, the conservative group underwent significantly more revision surgeries (conservative surgery: 85 [70.2%]; minor amputation: 252 [47.5%]; P < .01; adjusted HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8). CONCLUSION: We found that with comorbidity-based patient selection, conservative surgery in the treatment of DFO was associated with the same rates of clinical failure and microbiological recurrence at 1 year, but with significantly more revision surgeries during follow-up, compared with minor amputations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative effectiveness study.

The Epidemiology of Antibiotic-Related Adverse Events in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

The use of antibiotics for the treatment of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) over an extended period of time has been shown to be associated with adverse events (AEs), whereas interactions with concomitant patient medications must also be considered. The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the most frequent and most severe AEs reported in prospective trials and observational studies at the global level in DFI. Gastrointestinal intolerances were the most frequent AEs, from 5% to 22% among all therapies; this was more common when prolonged antibiotic administration was combined with oral beta-lactam or clindamycin or a higher dose of tetracyclines. The proportion of symptomatic colitis due to Clostridium difficile was variable depending on the antibiotic used (0.5% to 8%). Noteworthy serious AEs included hepatotoxicity due to beta-lactams (5% to 17%) or quinolones (3%); cytopenia's related to linezolid (5%) and beta-lactams (6%); nausea under rifampicin, and renal failure under cotrimoxazole. Skin rash was found to rarely occur and was commonly associated with the use of penicillins or cotrimoxazole. AEs from prolonged antibiotic use in patients with DFI are costly in terms of longer hospitalization or additional monitoring care and can trigger additional investigations. The best way to prevent AEs is to keep the duration of antibiotic treatment short and with the lowest dose clinically necessary.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections in Elective Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: The Role of Diabetes Mellitus.

Surgical site infection (SSI) after elective orthopedic foot and ankle surgery is uncommon and may be higher in selected patient groups. Our main aim was to investigate the risk factors for SSI in elective orthopedic foot surgery and the microbiological results of SSI in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, in a tertiary foot center between 2014 and 2022. Overall, 6138 elective surgeries were performed with an SSI risk of 1.88%. The main independent associations with SSI in a multivariate logistic regression analysis were an ASA score of 3-4 points, odds ratio (OR) 1.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.90), internal, OR 2.33 (95% CI 1.56-3.49), and external material, OR 3.08 (95% CI 1.56-6.07), and more than two previous surgeries, OR 2.86 (95% CI 1.93-4.22). Diabetes mellitus showed an increased risk in the univariate analysis, OR 3.94 (95% CI 2.59-5.99), and in the group comparisons (three-fold risk). In the subgroup of diabetic foot patients, a pre-existing diabetic foot ulcer increased the risk for SSI, OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.21-7.41), compared to non-ulcered diabetic patients. In general, gram-positive cocci were the predominant pathogens in SSI. In contrast, polymicrobial infections with gram-negative bacilli were more common in contaminated foot surgeries. In the latter group, the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis by second-generation cephalosporins did not cover 31% of future SSI pathogens. Additionally, selected groups of patients revealed differences in the microbiology of the SSI. Prospective studies are required to determine the importance of these findings for optimal perioperative antibiotic prophylactic measures.

Local Antibiotics in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections: A Narrative Review.

Along with the increasing global burden of diabetes, diabetic foot infections (DFI) and diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) remain major challenges for patients and society. Despite progress in the development of prominent international guidelines, the optimal medical treatment for DFI and DFO remains unclear as to whether local antibiotics, that is, topical agents and local delivery systems, should be used alone or concomitant to conventional systemic antibiotics. To better inform clinicians in this evolving field, we performed a narrative review and summarized key relevant observational studies and clinical trials of non-prophylactic local antibiotics for the treatment of DFI and DFO, both alone and in combination with systemic antibiotics. We searched PubMed for studies published between January 2000 and October 2022, identified 388 potentially eligible records, and included 19 studies. Our findings highlight that evidence for adding local antibiotic delivery systems to standard DFO treatment remains limited. Furthermore, we found that so far, local antibiotic interventions have mainly targeted forefoot DFO, although there is marked variation in the design of the included studies. Suggestive evidence emerging from observational studies underscores that the addition of local agents to conventional systemic antibiotics might help to shorten the clinical healing time and overall recovery rates in infected diabetic foot ulcers, although the effectiveness of local antibiotics as a standalone approach remains overlooked. In conclusion, despite the heterogeneous body of evidence, the possibility that the addition of local antibiotics to conventional systemic treatment may improve outcomes in DFI and DFO cannot be ruled out. Antibiotic stewardship principles call for further research to elucidate the potential benefits of local antibiotics alone and in combination with conventional systemic antibiotics for the treatment of DFI and DFO.

Current knowledge of morbidities and direct costs related to diabetic foot disorders: a literature review.

Diabetes is a chronic disease associated with numerous complications including diabetic foot disorders, which are associated with significant morbidity and mortality as well as high costs. The costs associated with diabetic foot disorders comprise those linked to care (direct) and loss of productivity and poor quality of life (indirect). Due to the constant increase in diabetes prevalence, it is expected that diabetic foot disorder will require more resources, both in terms of caregivers and economically. We reviewed findings on management, morbidity, mortality, and costs related to diabetic foot disorder.

Clinical usefulness of quantifying microbial load from diabetic foot ulcers: A multicenter cohort study.

AIMS: To evaluate if microbial load from diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) can help in predicting outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed in an outpatient setting (September 1, 2017-January 31, 2019) in diabetic patients with DFU.Quantitative cultures from DFU tissue biopsies at a baseline visit were obtained; high and low microbial loads were defined as ≥6logCFU/mL and <6logCFU/mL, respectively. Diagnosis of DFU infection was made and managed according to established guidelines. The outcome was evaluated at 6 month-visit as failure (persistence/new infection/amputation) or cure. RESULTS: Out of 65 patients, 52 (80%) had long-standing DFUs (≥4 weeks), with high microbial load in 19 (29%).DFU infection (n = 24, 37%) was not associated with high microbial load in all patients but those with shorter DFU duration.Treatment failure occurred in 20/57 (35%) patients; high DFU microbial load was associated with worse outcome (n = 9/20, 45% failure rate, adjusted OR4.69; 95% CI, 1.22-18.09; p = 0.03),mainly due to the subgroup of patients with high microbial load and long-stand DFUs. CONCLUSIONS: Since patients with high microbial load had a worse outcome, quantitative cultures from DFUs can identify patients who would benefit from antibiotic therapy.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam for difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections: A real-world tertiary hospital experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world clinical efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) in difficult-to-treat infections caused by multi-drug resistant Gram-negative microorganisms, including carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with C/T for at least 48 hours for infections caused by multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria in a tertiary hospital from May 2016 until August 2019. The primary outcome analysed was clinical failure, defined as a composite of symptomatology persistence after 7 days of C/T treatment, infection recurrence, and/or all-cause mortality within 30 days of follow-up. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 96 episodes of C/T treatment were included, mostly consisting of targeted treatments (83.9%) for the following sources of infection: intra-abdominal (22.6%), urinary tract (25.8%), skin and soft tissue (19.4%), hospital-acquired pneumonia (14%), and other (6.4%). The most frequently isolated bacteria were carbapenem-resistant (88, 94.6%). Clinical failure rate was 30.1%, due to persistent infection at day 7 (4.3%), recurrence of the initial infection (16.1%), or 30-day all-cause mortality (8.6%). Adverse events most frequently reported were Clostridium difficile infection (9%) and cholestasis (8%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: C/T showed a favourable clinical profile for difficult-to-treat multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, regardless of the source of infection.

Risk Factors of Daptomycin-Induced Eosinophilic Pneumonia in a Population with Osteoarticular Infection.

BACKGROUND: Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DEP) is a rare but severe adverse effect and the risk factors are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for DEP. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at the Bone and Joint Infection Unit of the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge (January 2014-December 2018). To identify risk factors for DEP, cases were divided into two groups: those who developed DEP and those without DEP. RESULTS: Among the whole cohort (n = 229) we identified 11 DEP cases (4.8%) and this percentage almost doubled in the subgroup of patients ≥70 years (8.1%). The risk factors for DEP were age ≥70 years (HR 10.19, 95%CI 1.28-80.93), therapy >14 days (7.71, 1.98-30.09) and total cumulative dose of daptomycin ≥10 g (5.30, 1.14-24.66). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should monitor cumulative daptomycin dosage to minimize DEP risk, and be cautious particularly in older patients when the total dose of daptomycin exceeds 10 g.

Role of asymptomatic bacteriuria on early periprosthetic joint infection after hip hemiarthroplasty. BARIFER randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate preoperative asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) treatment to reduce early-periprosthetic joint infections (early-PJIs) after hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) for fracture. METHODS: Open-label, multicenter RCT comparing fosfomycin-trometamol versus no intervention with a parallel follow-up cohort without ASB. PRIMARY OUTCOME: early-PJI after HHA. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-four patients enrolled (mean age 84.3); 152(25%) with ASB (77 treated with fosfomycin-trometamol/75 controls) and 442(75%) without. Despite the study closed without the intended sample size, ASB was not predictive of early-PJI (OR: 1.06 [95%CI: 0.33-3.38]), and its treatment did not modify early-PJI incidence (OR: 1.03 [95%CI: 0.15-7.10]). CONCLUSIONS: Neither preoperative ASB nor its treatment appears to be risk factors of early-PJI after HHA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: Eudra CT 2016-001108-47.

Bacteriemia por Eggerthella lenta asociada a poliposis colónica y adenocarcinoma de colon / Eggerthella lenta bacteremia associated to colonic polyps and colon adenocarcinoma

No disponible

Valor pronóstico de mortalidad del índice de control nutricional (CONUT) en pacientes ingresados por insuficiencia cardiaca aguda / Prognostic mortality value of the nutritional index (CONUT) in hospitalized patients for acute heart failure

Objetivos: Analizar el papel pronóstico de mortalidad de un índice nutricional en pacientes ingresados por insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA). Material Y Métodos: Evaluación prospectiva de 253 pacientes ingresados por ICA. Se evaluó su estado nutricional al ingreso mediante dos índices: el Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) y el índice de control nutricional (CONUT), y se compararon para documentar la correlación entre ellos. Además, se dividieron los pacientes en dos grupos: CONUT = 0-1 (nutrición correcta) vs ≥ 2 (malnutrición), comparando la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y al año en ambos casos. Resultados: Se detectó riesgo de malnutrición en 162 pacientes (62%) con el índice CONUT, solo 27 (10,6%) con el MNA-SF, sin observar correlación al comparar los valores de ambos. No se observaron diferencias en función del estado nutricional según el CONUT en la tasa de mortalidad intrahospitalaria y al año de seguimiento. Conclusiones: El índice CONUT no parece presentar correlación con el índice MNA-SF sobre el estado nutricional de los pacientes ingresados por ICA y tampoco aportar información pronóstica sobre el riesgo de mortalidad intrahospitalaria y al año del ingreso (AU)

Objectives: To analyze the prognostic value of an easily available nutritional index in hospitalized patients for acute heart failure (AHF). Material And Methods: Clinical and laboratory variables of 253 admitted patients due to AHF were prospectively evaluated. The Nutritional Control Index (CONUT) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) were calculated on admission and compared. Patients were divided into two groups: CONUT 0-1 (proper nutrition) vs CONUT ≥ 2 (malnutrition), and in hospital mortality and after one year of follow-up were assessed. Results: 162 patients (62%) had detectable risk of malnutrition on admission by CONUT score, when only 27 (10.6 %) by MNA-SF, showing no statistical. There were no differences between patients with proper nutrition and malnutrition by CONUT score in terms of in hospital mortality and after one year of follow-up. Conclusions: No correlation was shown between CONUT and MNA-SF scores for detecting nutritional status in hospitalized patients with AHF. Furthermore, CONUT score does not seem to provide useful prognostic information for detecting risk of in hospital mortality and after one year of follow-up (AU)